When i was doing My review for the Transformers ride I had thought about using Paeter's Quality and Relevance score but I think if you went on a ride with some friends and then try to sit down and talk about the spirtual relevance of the story (or the story of the ride in general) they would think you were crazy. so would it be OK if I do another Ride review if i can do Relevance N/A?
2 posters
Using Paeter's Review scores?
Rickster- Posts : 1443
Activity : 2338
Geek-Cred : 16
Join date : 2010-07-05
Age : 40
- Post n°1
Using Paeter's Review scores?
Paeter- Admin
- Posts : 5708
Activity : 8030
Geek-Cred : 60
Join date : 2010-02-17
Age : 45
Location : Mesa, AZ
- Post n°2
Re: Using Paeter's Review scores?
Well, I'd argue that technically even a ride has the POTENTIAL for meaningful conversation based on its content. But given what rides are, its highly unlikely. Which doesn't make the ride bad, immoral, or pointless. It would just mean a very low Relevance score. Even a 0/10 if you like. But I don't know if by nature the relevance category wouldn't apply.
In any case, I only require both a quality and relevance score for written reviews submitted for consideration on the blog in addition to the podcast. If all you want is to submit your review for the podcast(and not also for the blog), then you can include one, both or neither of the quality/relevance categories in your review. Totally up to you in that case.
In any case, I only require both a quality and relevance score for written reviews submitted for consideration on the blog in addition to the podcast. If all you want is to submit your review for the podcast(and not also for the blog), then you can include one, both or neither of the quality/relevance categories in your review. Totally up to you in that case.
|
|