In one of his Farscape Shawarma episodes, Paeter spoke about the interactions and relationships of the crew. He described them as jacked up, raging pools of emotional distress and personal dysfunction. I listened in agreement until he said something I found very odd - he said that this personal dysfunction was one of the primary appeals of the show.
I find this odd on many, many levels. First and foremost, I think I've had my fill of dysfunctional family and friends. I don't want to immerse myself in it in my entertainment. This type of interaction is a primary reason I stopped watching Farscape and new Battlestar Galactica. It is one of many, many, many reasons I actively loathe nu-Trek.
But many shows with this type of interaction have huge cult followings, and I simply cannot understand the appeal. Even stranger, the exact same social dynamic is present in shows like Road Rules, Big Brother, The Bachelor, and Survivor, the fanbase who wallows in this dysfunction on the SyFy channel looks down on the "reality" shows of the networks. I find the whole thing bizarre.
To complicate things, this kind of characterization is poor form. It results in characters that are difficult to explore because their attitudes and outlooks are constantly in flux. It is a tenet of character development that characters in community (comic books, tv series) should be consistent in order to build rapport with the audience, while the setting changes around them. The corollary is that characters in isolation (such as in movies and novels) need to grow and change as individuals within a fixed environment.
So why do shows with poor relationships, poor characterization, and tired plots (koff koff, Game of Thrones, koff koff) have such rabid fanbases? And why do the fans look down on the exact same show when the sci-fi elements are removed? I'm at a complete loss; I simply don't understand.
I find this odd on many, many levels. First and foremost, I think I've had my fill of dysfunctional family and friends. I don't want to immerse myself in it in my entertainment. This type of interaction is a primary reason I stopped watching Farscape and new Battlestar Galactica. It is one of many, many, many reasons I actively loathe nu-Trek.
But many shows with this type of interaction have huge cult followings, and I simply cannot understand the appeal. Even stranger, the exact same social dynamic is present in shows like Road Rules, Big Brother, The Bachelor, and Survivor, the fanbase who wallows in this dysfunction on the SyFy channel looks down on the "reality" shows of the networks. I find the whole thing bizarre.
To complicate things, this kind of characterization is poor form. It results in characters that are difficult to explore because their attitudes and outlooks are constantly in flux. It is a tenet of character development that characters in community (comic books, tv series) should be consistent in order to build rapport with the audience, while the setting changes around them. The corollary is that characters in isolation (such as in movies and novels) need to grow and change as individuals within a fixed environment.
So why do shows with poor relationships, poor characterization, and tired plots (koff koff, Game of Thrones, koff koff) have such rabid fanbases? And why do the fans look down on the exact same show when the sci-fi elements are removed? I'm at a complete loss; I simply don't understand.